| Photographer |
|
Educated and trained in engineering, I began taking an
interest in serious photography in conjunction with a growing
love for travel in the mid-Nineties. As with many photographers, there was a
progression from 35 mm cameras to the larger medium- and
large-format ones in the quest to maximize both quality and
print size. And while my photography interests
diversified, the scope of travel became more focused. Now,
each trip is limited to a small region, usually a single country
or area, to better immerse myself in the
short time afforded.
Based in Portland, Oregon, USA, I
photograph the abundant natural wonders of the area, with
special interest in the isolated eastern regions.
|
| Camera Formats |
|
Cameras are tools, the choice of which is
determined by each artist for a variety of personal reasons.
While digital photography is now catching up to quality
standards of 35 mm, it has a long way to go to reach that
attained by larger film formats. A 6x7 cm negative is
easily drum-scanned to file sizes in excess of 200 MByte while
large format film can be printed poster size without a
noticeable loss of sharpness, contrast, or increase in grain.
It will be many years before digital cameras come close to this.
Below is a brief synopsis of the cameras I currently use, listed
from largest to smallest format.
|
K.B. Canham Traditional Standard 810 |
|
I picked this up after wasting
money on a low-price 8x10, and I am very pleased with the results.
Not exactly light or heavy, it is very full featured, extremely
well crafted, and will probably suffice a lifetime of use and
abuse. I am currently employing three lenses on it: a Nikkor 150 mm
SW f8, a Rodenstock 300 mm Sironar N f5.6, and a Fujinon C600 mm F11.5.
This is the camera I used to shoot the murals in the
Tillamook State
Forest Interpretive Center
.
|
|
Polaroid 110B 4x5 Conversion |
|
I was very intrigued by the Littman 45 Single
but could not justify the cost of these superb cameras. I researched this and
finally chose Michael Batelman to do the work. Took a couple of months but the
work is superb. It is, by far, the fastest 4x5 I can think of, and a perfect
one for street work. I used this camera exclusively for the large format work
found in my 2006 India portfolio.
|
|
Linhof Master Technika |
|
After using a Horseman 45FA, I was hooked
on the metal folding camera but still wanted a full featured one. I found
a good deal on EBay and received a well-used one. I replaced the bellows
and put it to work. It really is all it's cracked up to be, but I won't
travel with it due to its weight. I leave a Rodenstock 150 mm Sironar S
in it (not cammed unfortunately), but use all my lenses. |
|
Horseman 45FA |
|
This small, tough, light
weight metal field large-format camera is my tool of
choice for any long-distance travel. Limited in
movements, bellows draw, and front-standard opening, it is
nevertheless rock solid
and a quick set-up, ideal for most photography not
requiring extreme movements. The Graflok back
allows me to use a 6x12 cm roll film holder so I can leave the panoramic camera at home. Perhaps
the biggest drawback of this camera is the limited
selection of lenses that are compatible with the small
front-standard opening. This is a compromise I
was willing to live with in a light-weight travel
camera. Horseman provides the list of compatible
lenses. I leave a 135 mm Sironar N attached, and
pack a 90 mm Nikkor f8 and 300 mm Nikkor f9. The
latter is only useable from about 70 yards to infinity
due to the 12" bellows draw. |
|
Shen-Hao
HZX45-IIA |
|
Very full-featured wood
field camera, used mainly on local assignments or those
requiring extensive movements as in architectural
photography. Once my primary LF camera, I now
prefer the more compact Horseman for travel.
Lenses used on this camera are of 47-, 75-, 150-, and
210 mm focal length. |
|
Fuji
G617 |
|
A fixed-lens 6x17 cm
format panoramic camera. Massive 60" long prints
can be made easily from one of its nearly 7" long
negatives. |
|
Fuji GW690II |
|
My primary handheld
camera, this all-manual, 6x9 cm, fixed-lens rangefinder
always accompanies me on my travels. In fact, if
ever forced to bring a single camera, this would be the
one. The legendary 90 mm lens is unsurpassed,
yielding spectacular prints even when enlarged to 40+
inches. No longer available new, these can be found on
the used market. Its sister, the wider GSW690 with
a 65 mm lens has a similar reputation, but I prefer the
slightly longer compositions. |
|
Mamiya RZ67
Pro II |
|
Probably the best camera
system in my possession, its weight and size preclude
much use outside the studio except for portraiture or
still-life work. While I did take it to Greece
once, I could take both a 4x5" with two lenses and my
6x9 at about the same weight. The negatives
produced by the camera, however, are second to none.
Lenses used are 50-, 110-, and 250 mm. |
|
Bronica GS-1 |
|
I learned the hard way not to take a
Mamiya RZ67 on travel, but I loved the 6x7 TLR format. I learned about
the Bronica GS-1, discontinued, and then found full systems on EBay going
for a song. I primarily shoot the versatile 110 mm macro, but always bring along a
65 mm and a 200 mm lens. Great camera, especially for the money. |
|
Yashica Yashicamat 124G |
|
This compact 6x6 cm has its fans and its detractors. Quality must have
been inconsistent because I have read both great and
not-so-great things about its lens, the 80 mm Yashinon,
but I must have a good one. I have a 30x30" printed from a negative produced by the camera
(handheld no less) that shows absolutely no softening of
sharpness including at the print edges. It even
looks like it could go another 10". Once I
purchased my GW690II, I find I no longer use the camera
much except when I need the utmost in compactness and
lightness. |
|
Nikon
N70 |
|
While I no longer shoot
35 mm, this camera was once my mainstay. Its
work can be found in my Jordan and Egypt galleries.
Great, dependable cameras. Some images enlarge
well to 16"x24". |
|
| Film Preferences |
|
Below is a list of the film types used primarily in my work.
While 75% of my work is in B/W, I prefer color in vibrant
compositions as well as low-light and nighttime photography.
I am continually pleased that despite the inroads digital
photography is making, film manufacturers are still developing
and releasing new emulsions.
|
Fuji
Acros 100 |
|
My primary B/W film, I
use this ultra-fine grain film except when handheld
photography is required. I rate this at 80 EI and
nearly always give it N development. |
|
Kodak TMAX 100 |
|
Another very fine grain
film that I have used extensively. This was my
favorite B/W emulsion until Fuji released Acros. I
still use it on occasion as I find the contrast to be
lower than Fuji's. |
|
Kodak BW400CN |
|
When handheld B/W
photography is required, BW400CN gets the job. The
tone is so smooth, it's also my choice for portraiture
even when a tripod is available. I usually rate
this at 200 EI, always with N development. If the
world only produced one film, this would get my vote.
Why no 4x5"? |
|
Fuji
Velvia 100F |
|
While tamer than its
predecessor, this slide film still wows with saturation.
While I do love Velvia 50's palette a bit more, I am
willing to forego it to gain a little more contrast
control. This film is now my primary slide film,
edging out Kodak's E100VS unless I'm looking for red
tones. |
|
Kodak
E100VS |
|
Ultra saturated and
fairly fine grained, this slide film enhances sunsets
and sunrises like no other. Because of its
slightly higher grain index, I have switched to Velvia
100F, but am looking forward to its follow-on, whenever
that is. |
|
Fuji
Velvia 50 |
|
While this is still the
favorite for most landscape photographers, I have tended
towards the newer version because I just could not dial
in the contrast. When it's on, there is no better
film; however, more of my shots had blown out skies or
conversely, black featureless shadows. Others have
great success with it, but my performance is spotty.
When I see a low-contrast lighting situation, I will
reach for it. Otherwise, I go 100F. |
|
Kodak E100G |
|
When the contrast is
high, this slide film family gets the nod. Great
grain performance, but colors are fairly ordinary.
Great for when the scenery is vibrant. |
|
Kodak
160VC |
|
For color print film, I really like this emulsion.
Fine grain, lightly saturated, it has great contrast
control and can produce some excellent images in
nighttime photography. I try to bring a handful of
sheets when traveling. |
|
Kodak
400UC |
|
Available up to medium format, this film is my choice
for handheld color photography. Very saturated, it
still produces great skin tones even in adverse
conditions with harsh lighting. I rate it at 250
EI. |
|
| Travel Photography Tips |
|
You've heard the adage: pack up the barest
necessities for your trip, pick your bag(s) up and walk around a
bit, set them down, and then unpack half. The same applies for
camera gear.
I am an ultra-lightest, or try to be, when it comes to travel
photography. And, despite all my best attempts, I
always haul too much gear and film. But, I am headed
in the right direction with each trip. The best thing I do
towards this end is to keep detailed notes on what I bring,
including film, and what I actually use. Analyzing this
after the fact has allowed me to reduce my dead weight by quite
a bit. For example, I no longer pack four lenses once I found out that
two
of them took 90% of the images on one particular journey.
I also no longer load film because I do not want to carry the
extra weight of film holders, not to mention the loading tent.
While not available in larger formats, the quick/ready-load
systems was my answer. Unfortunately, it significantly
lowers the film packaging density (and raises the cost), it does
provide dust-free operation as well as allows you to enjoy your
evenings without having to unload and reload film after a day's
shooting.
Tripods are another area where compromise is called for when
used in long-haul travel. I now use a
Manfrotto Carbon One
440 now that my cameras are over 3 lbs. Less than that, I
would have no problem using a small lightweight aluminum unit.
I have been known to use jackets or towels to rest a camera on a
wall or a rock when available. Tripod heads are another
area that is typically overdone. Until I
found the lightweight
Manfrotto 484 RC2 ball head, I got by with
an even smaller monopod head that provided only tilt.
Unless one routinely shoots in heavy winds or with large cameras
and lenses, massive, heavy tripods are just not required.
Why pack them?
I have even dispensed with a focusing cloth for travel.
My Horseman comes with a built-in pop-up hood that works for
most situations. I can always use my jacket or shirt in a
pinch for the other cases.
My travel bag is a
Lowepro Mini Trekker AW. While very
comfortable, its biggest feature in my book is that it's small.
Very small. This forces me to limit the gear that is
packed. I currently pack the following items:
-
Horseman
45FA camera w/Rodenstock
Sironar N 135 mm lens attached
-
Nikkor 90 mm SW f8 (and
occasionally
Nikkor M 300 mm f9)
-
Kodak Readyloader
-
Fuji GW690II camera
-
Horseman 6x12 roll film
holder
(but not on long-hauls)
- Filter wallet with 6 filters
-
Gossen Starlite and Digisix
meters (latter is used for street photography)
- Loupe, penlight, pen and note
paper, assortment of filter adapters and cable releases
- SB28 Flash (rarely)
Film is packed in a separate bag as I always attempt to get
this hand-inspected, usually to no avail. A recent trip (Thailand, 3 weeks) was made with the following
film:
4x5:
Fuji
Acros 100 - brought 40 quickload sheets, shot all.
Fuji Velvia 100F - brought 20
quickload sheets, shot all.
120:
Kodak
BW400CN - brought 40 rolls, shot 23.
Fuji
Acros 100 - brought 20 rolls, shot 1.
Kodak
400UC - brought 40 rolls, shot 11.
Fuji Velvia 100F - brought 10 rolls,
shot 4.
Adjustments were made based on this to further reduce load
for subsequent travel. Incidentally, all this film passed
through no less than 7 airport scanners with no noticeable
fogging. Note that the 400 ISO film was packed in
lead-lined bags, but the 100 ISO film passed straight through.
While I was able to get hand-inspection with the TSA folks in
the US (although I did set off the alarm in the chemical sensor
detector...), it was not granted in 3 other countries.
|
| Feedback |
|

|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|